Journal cover Journal topic
Earth System Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.351 IF 4.351
  • IF 5-year value: 5.124 IF 5-year
    5.124
  • CiteScore value: 4.44 CiteScore
    4.44
  • SNIP value: 1.250 SNIP 1.250
  • IPP value: 4.10 IPP 4.10
  • SJR value: 2.203 SJR 2.203
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 29 Scimago H
    index 29
  • h5-index value: 31 h5-index 31
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-82
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-82
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 10 Jan 2020

Submitted as: research article | 10 Jan 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal ESD.

Constraints on long term warming in a climate mitigation scenario

Benjamin Sanderson Benjamin Sanderson
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder CO, USA

Abstract. Cumulative emissions budgets and net-zero emission target dates are often used to frame climate negotiations (Frameet al., 2014; Millar et al., 2016; Van Vuuren et al., 2016; Rogelj et al., 2015b; Matthews et al., 2012). However, their utilityfor near-term policy decisions is confounded by an uncertainties in future negative emissions capacity (Fuss et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2016; Larkin et al., 2018; Anderson and Peters, 2016) and in long term Earth System response to climate forcers(Rugenstein et al., 2019; Knutti et al., 2017; Armour, 2017) which may impact the utility of an indefinite carbon budget if peak temperatures occur significantly after net zero emissions are achieved, the likelihood of which in a simple model is conditionalon prior assumptions about the long term dynamics of the Earth System. Here we illustrate that the risks associated with nearterm positive emissions can be framed using a definite cumulative emissions budget with a 2040 time horizon, allowing thenecessity and scope for negative emissions deployment later in the century to be better informed by observed warming overcoming decades.

Benjamin Sanderson

Interactive discussion

Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Benjamin Sanderson

Benjamin Sanderson

Viewed

Total article views: 210 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
170 40 0 210 12 0 5
  • HTML: 170
  • PDF: 40
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 210
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jan 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Jan 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 171 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 171 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Feb 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Levels of future temperature change are often used interchangeably with carbon budget allowances in climate policy – a relatively robust relationship on the timescale of this century. However, recent advances in understanding underline that continued warming after net-zero emissions have been achieved cannot be ruled out by observations of warming to date. We consider here how such behavior could be constrained, and how policy can be framed in the context of these uncertainties.
Levels of future temperature change are often used interchangeably with carbon budget allowances...
Citation