Journal cover Journal topic
Earth System Dynamics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.769 IF 3.769
  • IF 5-year value: 4.522 IF 5-year 4.522
  • CiteScore value: 4.14 CiteScore 4.14
  • SNIP value: 1.170 SNIP 1.170
  • SJR value: 2.253 SJR 2.253
  • IPP value: 3.86 IPP 3.86
  • h5-index value: 26 h5-index 26
  • Scimago H index value: 22 Scimago H index 22
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-40
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-40
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 09 May 2017

Research article | 09 May 2017

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript is under review for the journal Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

On the Future Role of the most Parsimonious Climate Module in Integrated Assessment

Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
  • Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Universität Hamburg, Grindelberg 5, 20144 Hamburg, Germany

Abstract. We test the validity of a one-box climate model as an emulator for Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) when the application is confined to the subset of scenarios approximately in-line with the 2° target. The one-box climate model is currently in use in the integrated assessment models FUND and MIND. For our assessment, we crucially rely on 14 recent CMIP5 AOGCM diagnostics of the total radiative forcing for various representative concentration pathways. Our findings are two-fold. Firstly, when directly prescribing AOGCMs’ respective equilibrium climate sensitivities (ECSs) and transient climate responses (TCRs) to the one-box model, global mean temperature (GMT) projections are generically too large by 0.5K at peak temperature. Accordingly, corresponding integrated assessment studies might overestimate mitigation need and cost. Secondly, the one-box model becomes an excellent emulator of those AOGCMs once their ECS and TCR values are universally mapped onto effective one-box intrinsic counterparts. We suggest utilizing this one-box model in integrated assessment also in the future, in particular when computationally demanding decision-making under climate response uncertainty might be modelled. However, then the roles of ECS and TCR must be re-interpreted. For the MIND model as used over the past 5 years, even the transformed ECS values comply with the ranges explicated by IPCC AR5, however now at the high-end.

Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Mohammad M. Khabbazan and Hermann Held
Viewed  
Total article views: 773 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
634 106 33 773 8 34
  • HTML: 634
  • PDF: 106
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 773
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 766 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Jan 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share