|
|
Estimation of the climate feedback parameter by using radiative fluxes from CERES EBAFP. Björnbom | Interactive Discussion | Status: Closed (Peer-Review Interrupted) |
| AC: Author Comment | RC: Referee Comment | SC: Short Comment | EC: Editor Comment |
 - Printer-friendly Version  - Supplement |
| | | AC C1: 'Additional discussion of surface air temperature anomalies', Pehr Björnbom, 19 Jan 2013 | | | | RC C11: 'ENSO is not a surrogate for forced climate change.', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2013 | | AC C27: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Pehr Björnbom, 07 Feb 2013 | | | | AC C18: 'Reply to Troy CA', Pehr Björnbom, 05 Feb 2013 | | SC C53: 'Comment on validation in “Estimation of the climate feedback parameter by using radiative fluxes from CERES EBAF”', Troy Masters, 16 Feb 2013 | | | | AC C48: 'Hypotheses and estimated parameter value are supported by generally accepted ENSO theory', Pehr Björnbom, 15 Feb 2013 | | | | AC C68: 'Observed coherent oscillations in temperature and radiative flux anomalies are also found in climate model simulations promising possible new insights into climate sensitivity', Pehr Björnbom, 23 Feb 2013 | | | | AC C90: 'Comparison of my paper with Dessler (2013) raises some doubts about using conventional linear regression for studying feedbacks', Pehr Björnbom, 02 Mar 2013 | | | | AC C137: 'Comparison of my paper with Armour et al. (2012) gives a possible explanation to the observed time lag in global radiative thermal response.', Pehr Björnbom, 25 Mar 2013 | | | | RC C161: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Apr 2013 | | AC C189: 'Response to Anonymous Referee \#2 and also final response: The interactive discussion and recent papers have convinced me that an even more thorough revision than a major one is needed.', Pehr Björnbom, 23 Apr 2013 | | | | EC C202: 'Editor comment', Julia C. Hargreaves, 24 Apr 2013 |
|
|
