Earth System Dynamics Discussions www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net 2190-4995 2 2 2011 10.5194/esdd-2-467-2011 http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/2/467/2011/ http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/2/467/2011/esdd-2-467-2011.html http://www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/2/467/2011/esdd-2-467-2011.pdf 467 491 2011-07-01 The magnitude-timescale relationship of surface temperature feedbacks in climate models A. Jarvis a.jarvis@lancs.ac.uk Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK Because of the fundamental role feedbacks play in determining the characteristics of climate it is important we are able to specify both the magnitude and response timescale of the feedbacks we are interested in. This paper employs three different climate models driven to equilibrium with a 4 × CO₂ forcing to analyze the magnitude and timescales of surface temperature feedbacks. These models are a global energy balance model, an intermediate complexity climate model and a general circulation model. Rather than split surface temperature feedback into characteristic physical processes, this paper adopts a linear systems approach to split feedback according to their time constants and corresponding feedback amplitudes. The analysis reveals that there is a dominant net negative feedback realised during the first year. However, this is partially attenuated by a spectrum of positive feedbacks for time constants in the range 10 to 1000 years. This attenuation was composed of two discrete phases which are attributed to the effects of ''diffusive – mixed layer'' and ''circulatory – deep ocean'' ocean heat equilibration processes. The diffusive equilibration was associated with time constants on the decadal timescale and accounted for approximately 75 to 80 % of the overall ocean heat equilibration feedback, whilst the circulatory feedback operated on a centennial timescale and accounted for the remaining 20 to 25 % of the response. It is important to quantify these decadal and centennial feedback processes to understand the range of climate model projections on these longer timescales. Aires, F. and Rossow, W. B.: Inferring instantaneous, multivariate and nonlinear sensitivities for the analysis of feedback processes in a dynamical system: Lorenz model case-study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 239–275, 2003. Barker, M. B. and Roe, G. H.: The shape of things to come: why is climate change so unpredictable?, J. Climate, 22, 4574–4589, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2647.1doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2647.1, 2009. Bates, J. R.: Some considerations of the concept of climate feedback, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 545–560, 2007. Beer, T. and Young, P. C.: Longitudinal dispersion in natural streams, American Society of Civil Engineering, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 109, 1049–1067, 1983. Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S., Dufresne, J.-L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., Ingram, W., Randall, D. A., Soden, B. J., Tselioudis, G., and Webb, M. J.: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?, J. Climate, 19, 3445–3482, 2006. Colman, R. A.: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models, Clim. Dynam., 20, 865–873, 2003. Danabasoglu, G. and Gent, P. R.: Equilibrium climate sensitivity: is it accurate to use a slab ocean model?, J. Climate, 22, 2494–2499, 2009. Dickinson, R. E.: Convergence Rate and Stability of Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling Schemes with a Zero-Dimensional Climate Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2112–2120, 1981. Dickinson, R. E. and Schaudt, K. J.: Analysis of timescales of response of a simple climate model, J. Climate, 11, 97–106, 1998. Eickhout, B., den Elzen, M. G. J., and Kreileman, G. J. J.: The Atmosphere-Ocean System of IMAGE~2.2, A global model approach for atmospheric concentrations, and climate and sea level projections, RIVM report 481508017/2004, RIVM, Bilthoven, 2004. Enting, I. G.: Laplace transform analysis of the carbon cycle, Environ. Model. Softw., 22, 1488–1497, 2007. Forster, P. M. and Taylor, K. E.: Climate Forcings and Climate Sensitivities Diagnosed from Coupled Climate Model Integrations, J. Climate, 19, 6181–6194, 2006. Goodwin, G. C. and Payne, R. L.: Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis, Academic Press, London, 1977. Gregory, J. M. and Forster, P. M.: Transient climate response estimated from radiative forcing and observed temperature change, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D23105, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010405doi:10.1029/2008JD010405, 2008. Gregory, J. M., Ingram, W. J., Palmer, M. A., Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A., Thorpe, R. B., Lowe, J. A., Johns, T. C., and Williams, K. D.: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018747doi:10.1029/2003GL018747, 2004. Grieser, J. and Schönwiese, C.-D.: Process, forcing, and signal analysis of global mean temperature variations by means of a three-box energy balance model, Climatic Change, 48, 617–646, 2001. Hallegatte, S., Lahellec, A., and Grandpeix, J. Y.: An elicitation of the dynamic nature of water vapor feedback in climate change using a 1D~model, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1878–1894, 2006. Hansen, J. E., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Stone, P., Fung, I., Ruedy, R., and Lerner, J.: Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms, in: Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, edited by: Hansen, J. E and Takahashi, T., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 130–163, 1984. Hansen, J., Russell, G., Lacis, A., Fung, I., Rind, D., and Stone, P.: Climate response times: Dependence on climate sensitivity and ocean mixing, Science, 229, 857–859, 1985. \clearpage Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D. W., and Siddall, M.: Climate change and trace gases, Philos. T. Roy. Soc A, 365, 1925–1954, 2007. Hoffert, M. I., Calligari, A. J., and Hseich, C.-T.: The role of deep sea heat storage in the secular response to climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 6667–6679, 1980. Hooss, G.: Aggregate models of climate change: developments and applications, PhD thesis, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, 2001. Jarvis, A. J. and Li, S.: On the timescale-gain relationship of climate models, Clim. Dynam., 36, 523–531, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0753-ydoi:10.1007/s00382-010-0753-y, 2011. Knutti, R. and Hegerl, G. C.: The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 735–743, 2008. Kreft, A. and Zuber, A.: On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation andits solutions for different initial and boundary conditions, Chem. Eng. Sci., 33, 1472–1480, 1978. Li, S. and Jarvis, A. J.: The global mean surface temperature dynamics of an AOGCM: The HadCM3 4 × CO₂ forcing experiment revisited, Clim. Dynam., 33, 817–825, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0581-0doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0581-0, 2009. Li, S., Jarvis, A. J., and Leedal, D. T.: Are response function representations of the global carbon cycle ever interpretable?, Tellus~B, 61, 361–371, 2009. Lu, J. and Cai, M.: A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models, Part~I: formulation, Clim. Dynam., 32, 873–885, 2009. Manabe, S., Stouffer, R. J., Spelman, M. J., and Bryan, K.: Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO₂, Part~I Annual mean response, J. Climate, 4, 785–817, 1991. Prather, M. J.: Time scales in atmospheric chemistry: Theory, GWPs for CH₄ and CO, and runaway growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2597–2600, 1996. Raper, S. C. B., Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J.: The role of climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake on AOGCM transient temperature response, J. Climate, 15, 124–130, 2002. Roe, G. H.: Feedbacks, timescales and seeing red, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sc., 37, 93–115, 2009. Roe, G. H. and Barker, M. B.: Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?, Science, 318, 629–632, 2007. Soden, B. J. and Held, I. M.: An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models, J. Climate, 19, 3354–3360, 2006. \clearpage Stephens, G. L.: Cloud Feedbacks in the Climate System: A Critical Review, J. Climate, 18, 237–273, 2005. Stouffer, R. J.: Time scales of climate response, J. Climate, 17, 209–217, 2004. Watterson, I. G.: Interpretation of simulated global warming using a simple model, J. Climate, 13, 202–215, 2000. Watts, R. G., Morantine, M. C., and Achutarao, K.: Timescales in energy balance climate models, 1 The limiting case solutions, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3631–3641, 1994. Weaver, A. J.: The UVic Earth System Climate Model: Model description, climatology and application to past, present and future climates, Atmos. Ocean, 39(3), 361–428, 2001. Wigley, T. M. L. and Schlesinger, M. E.: Analytical solution for the effect on increasing CO₂ on global mean temperature, Nature, 315, 649–652, 1985. Yang, W. Y., Cao, W., Chung, T.-S., and Morris, J.: Applied numerical method using MATLAB®. Wiley-Interscience, New Jersy, 2005. Young, P. C.: Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2011.